Civil Justice Council Launches Review of Pre Action Protocols

Together we are Forbes


29 October, 2020

Siobhan Hardy

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) is conducting a review of all the pre-action protocols (PAPs). The review will look at all aspects of PAPs, including their purpose, whether they are working effectively in practice and whether any reforms are required.

The CJC is particularly interested in how PAPs are working for litigants with limited means, the costs associated with compliance, the potential of PAPs in online dispute resolution and the potential for PAPs to be streamlined. However, the focus is not closed, and the CJC is conducting a preliminary survey to obtain feedback and suggestions about the focus of the review and the priorities for reform.

Therefore, the CJC would like to hear from anyone with experience of, or interest in, PAPs. A survey is available online until 18 December 2020.

The provisional terms of reference for the review are as follows:

  1. What amendments to the PAPs, or associated guidance to LIPs, would be desirable to draw litigants' attention to the effects of Jet2 Holidays Limited v Hughes & Hughes [2019] EWCA Civ 1858?
  2. Are there any PAPs that are not fulfilling the purposes of PAPs as originally envisioned by Lord Woolf and/or the purposes currently set out in CPR PD 18? What function should PAPs perform in the 2020s?
  3. Are there major inconsistencies between PAPs and are these justified by the differences in the litigation to which they relate?
  4. Are the "soft sanctions" for non-compliance with voluntary pre-action protocols - case management directions and costs orders - being regularly and consistently applied?
  5. Should all PAPs be mandatory? Should any PAPs be mandatory? What should the sanctions for non-compliance be?
  6. Are any PAPS overly technical or burdensome to litigants and can they be streamlined?
  7. Are any PAPs lacking key steps that ought to be required of parties, or prohibit initiatives that should be allowed?
  8. Are PAPs a mechanism for de facto compulsory ADR prior to commencement of litigation? Should they be?
  9. What are the ratios of cases settled at the PAP stage compared to post issue mediation?
  10. Should there be any changes to PAPs as a result of the HMCTS reform programme and the digitisation of the civil justice system generally? To what extent are PAPs already online? Should there be further digitalisation of PAP steps and guidance?

For more information contact Siobhan Hardy in our Insurance department via email or phone on 0113 386 2686. Alternatively send any question through to Forbes Solicitors via our online Contact Form.

Learn more about our Insurance department here

Increased time limit for agreed time extensions in civil…

HSE carrying out COVID-19 Health and Safety Spot Checks and…

Contact Us

Get in touch to see how our experts could help you.

Call0800 689 3206

CallRequest a call back

EmailSend us an email

Contacting Us

Monday to Friday:
09:00 to 17:00

Saturday and Sunday: