Simone Agoreyo -v- London Borough of Lambeth (Appeal)

Employment & HR Article

25 September, 2017

Summary of the facts
The Appellant in this case was a newly appointed teacher at the school. It was alleged that within the first few weeks of her employment there were three incidents which occurred whilst dealing with particularly challenging children who had special educational needs, for which the Appellant had no particular experience or training. The incidents included removing the children from the class room and being seen to shout at them on the corridors.

The Appellant was suspended following these three incidents on 14 December 2012 on the basis that a fair investigation was to be carried out, which lead to the Appellant's resignation. Despite having reached out for help, additional support was only implemented the week of the Appellants suspension and thus insufficient time had lapsed to prove whether the Appellant had the capacity to cope with her class with this support in place.

The question for the court was whether the suspension was the appropriate response in this case. There were allegations from Judge Wulwik that he thought that the resignation was a ploy by the Appellant to avoid a thorough investigation - this opinion was wholly dismissed on appeal.

The legal perspective

Statutory guidance on suspension, key points are as follows:

  1. If an allegation is made against a teacher the quick resolution of that allegation should be a clear priority to all concerned. Any unnecessary delays should be eradicated.
  2. In response to an allegation all other options should be considered before suspending a member of staff, suspension should not be the default option. An individual should be suspended only if there is no reasonable alternative. If suspension is deemed appropriate, the reasons and justification should be recorded by the Employer and the individual notified of the reasons.

The Appeal
Mr Justice Foskett concluded that he believed the suspension of the Appellant was a "knee-jerk" reaction especially given that at least the two first incidents that had occurred had actually already been considered reasonable by the Head Teacher. On this basis he considered that the suspension was a breach of the implied term relation to trust and confidence.

He was unable to conclude that suspension was the ONLY option that was available to the school and the suspension was not justified as being for the protection of the children but was actually justified to allow for a fair investigation.

Finally, Mr Justice Foskett believed that there was nothing in the evidence to suggest that the Appellant was even given the chance to respond to the allegations in turn and give her "side of the story" so to speak before suspension was even considered and that any alternative was simply ignored.

The point to take away from this case is that Employers should not implement suspension as a default reaction and should give due consideration to alternative options that may be reasonable. All allegations should be considered carefully and Employees should be given the opportunity, if reasonable in the circumstances to respond to these allegations, before considering whether to suspend pending investigation.

If you are looking for any more information with regards to our services view our Education section. You can also contact Ruth Rule-Mullen in our Education department via email or phone on 01772 220195. Alternatively send any question through to Forbes Solicitors via our online Contact Form.


We wouldn't work with any other firm when it comes to employment and HR topics.

Charlotte Jackson
UK HR Business Partner
Voith Paper Ltd

More clients

The service offering at Forbes is of outstanding quality and value and has consistently exceeded our expectations.

Kathryn Robinson
Head of HR
Accrol Papers

More clients

Head of department Jonathan Holden leads a team of 'highly competent individuals' covering the full range of employment matters.

2018-19 edition Legal 500

More clients

Forbes Solicitors provides 'swift, efficient and pragmatic advice to its clients'.

2018-19 edition Legal 500

More clients

We find that the Forbes team take a pragmatic and supportive approach and enjoy working with their team.

Jayne Mizon
HR Manager
Kepak Convenience Foods

More clients

We approached Forbes Solicitors on a recommendation because as a small independent organisation we needed clear guidance and backing on HR matters.

Stephen Neaves
Piccadilly Garden & Support Service

More clients

The Forbes team were fantastic, the work and effort they put in was impressive and I was made to feel at ease throughout the proceedings. I can not thank the Forbes team enough

Peter Morley

More clients

Without doubt Jonathan Holden is like a security blanket. He understands that schools need to act in the best interest of school as a whole

Brenda P Allen

More clients

I will keep promoting you and your services because I'm fully committed to the quality of your work and the impact that it has in school.

Sharon Asquith
Ashton Community Science College

More clients

Amy Stokes was more than helpful throughout the whole process - Thank you Amy.

Stephen Fielden

More clients

Forbes are proactive in relation to changes in legislation and keep me informed via regular seminars, updates and bulletins.

Nicola Watson
Business Support Manager
Birchall Catering Supplies Ltd

More clients

I have always found everyone at Forbes to be approachable, helpful and professional, and would have no hesitation in recommending them to any other business

Catherine Ogden
Commercial Director
E A Foulds Limited

More clients

May I say how much the employment team at Forbes have helped Samlesbury Hall with staff issues over the past ten years.

Sharon Jones
Hall Director
Samlesbury Hall

More clients

...we have found Forbes to be an excellent team of people to work with, fully understanding our needs and goals.

Landon Helsby
Managing Director
Apeks Marine Equipment Ltd.

More clients

Make an enquiry