Is it fair to dismiss Employees who are unable to provide documentary evidence of their right to work in the UK?

Education Article

08 December, 2017

The immediate answer in everybody's mind would be yes - especially in schools where the burden for employment checks is especially high. S15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 makes it unlawful for an employer to employ and adult who is subject to immigration control. However, under s15 (3) there is a statutory excuse from the penalty if the employer can show that it undertook certain documentary checks.

Furthermore, Keeping Children Safe in Education states at paragraph 102 that schools and colleges must verify a person's right to work in the UK by checking original documents, ensuring that they are valid in the presence of the prospective employee and keeping a record of the checks carried out and copies of documents inspected. If they are uncertain that the right exists they must carry out further checks as necessary.

In the case of Baker v Abellio London, Mr Baker was a Jamaican national who was a bus driver. Mr Baker was not subject to immigration control and had the right to live and work in the UK. His employer had requested further documentary evidence of this right and when this was not provided Mr Baker was suspended without pay and ultimately dismissed.

Initially the Employment Tribunal held that the dismissal was fair, however this decision has been subsequently overturned by the EAT. Whilst it is a potentially a fair reason to dismiss an employee if their continued employment would be illegal, you must be certain that it is actually illegal for the dismissal to be fair under the statutory restriction. If it later turns out that the employment was legal then the dismissal would not have been fair.

Nevertheless, this is not to say that you shouldn't dismiss if you have genuine concerns that the continued employment of that employee would be illegal. If this is the case you should ensure that a reasonable investigation has been carried out and that all other checks are exhausted before considering to dismiss. A dismissal in these circumstances may fall under Some Other Substantial Reason (SOSR) rather than the statutory restriction.

Our advice would be to ensure that careful checks are carried out prior to the appointment of the employees and if for some reason suspicions arise later, you must ensure that reasonable investigations are carried out before dismissal is considered. Schools and Colleges must adhere to the verification requirements set out in Keeping Children Safe in Education which should highlight any issues at the outset of employment.

If you require any more information, please view our Education section on the Forbes website or contact Ruth Rule-Mullen in our Education department via email or phone on 01772 220195. Alternatively, please send any question through to Forbes Solicitors via our online Contact Form.

Back

16 Feb 2018

Education

NEWS AND ARTICLES

Questions we have been asked this month

Read the article

Forbes Solicitors worked alongside our year 13 Law students to support and challenge their understanding of the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales.

Chris Atkinson
Assistant Principal
Saint Wilfrid?s C.E Academy

More clients

Ruth Rule-Mullen and her team from Forbes Solicitors provided our students with a unique insight into careers in Law.

Lucy Diffley
St Bede's RC High School

More clients

Without doubt Jonathan Holden is like a security blanket. He understands that schools need to act in the best interest of school as a whole

Brenda P Allen
FCIPD

More clients

I will keep promoting you and your services because I'm fully committed to the quality of your work and the impact that it has in school.

Sharon Asquith
Principal
Ashton Community Science College

More clients

Make an enquiry