Employment & HR Article
10 April, 2018
Ms Gomes worked for a company providing accommodation and support services for vulnerable young people. She brought a claim for compensation before the Employment Tribunal for failure to allow her rest breaks. Under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) ("WTR"), workers are entitled to an unpaid rest break of 20 minutes when working for more than six hours per day (Regulation 12(1)). Along with a claim for loss of earnings, she alleged that her employer's failure had caused damage to her health and well-being.
Regulation 30(4) provides that the amount of the compensation shall be such as the tribunal considers just and equitable in all the circumstances, having regard to; the employer's default in refusing to permit the worker to exercise the right, and any loss sustained by the worker which is attributable to the matters complained of. The compensation is not intended to be punitive.
The tribunal found the employer to be in breach of Regulation 12. At the remedies hearing, the parties agreed a pecuniary loss of £1,220 in respect of loss of earnings, but disagreed about whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to make an additional compensatory award reflecting injury to feelings. The tribunal found it had no such jurisdiction under the WTR.
Ms Gomes appealed to the EAT claiming that an award for injury to feelings could be implied on a proper construction of Regulation 30. The EAT rejected her appeal and upheld the decision of the tribunal.
Ms Gomes then appealed to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the EAT had been wrong as a matter of law. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal confirming that there was no power in domestic law to award compensation for injury to feelings for breach of the WTR. Nor did the Working Time Directive warrant such an interpretation.
The Court of Appeal clarified that the wording of Regulation 30(4) did not support the conclusion that injury to feelings should be compensated, whether expressly or implicitly. The phrase "just and equitable" did not confer a general power on tribunals to award what they thought should be justly awarded, and the phrase was not broad enough to confer jurisdiction to award compensation for injury to feelings. If that were the case, there would be jurisdiction to make such an award in unfair dismissal cases, and this had been ruled out in Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council  UKHL 36 (in that case the Court ruled that non-economic loss was not recoverable in unfair dismissal cases).
The net effect of the failure to provide a paid break was that the worker was required to work for a longer period than they were being paid for. The natural remedy for such a wrong was compensation for that time based on the employee's rate of pay, as the tribunal had found in the first instance.
If you are looking for more information in relation to the Working Time Regulations or any of our services, please view our Employment & HR section. You can also contact our Employment and HR team by telephone on 0333 207 1135. Alternatively, send your enquiry to us through our online contact form.
21 Mar 2019
Employment & HR
In iForce Ltd v Wood, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employee?s mistaken belief that her…
Emma led us through a complex Employment Tribunal case which we would not have successfully succeeded without her and the team at Forbes support, they made us feel at ease throughout the process
Alexander Dennis Limited
We wouldn't work with any other firm when it comes to employment and HR topics.
UK HR Business Partner
Voith Paper Ltd
The service offering at Forbes is of outstanding quality and value and has consistently exceeded our expectations.
Head of HR
Head of department Jonathan Holden leads a team of 'highly competent individuals' covering the full range of employment matters.
2018-19 edition Legal 500
Forbes Solicitors provides 'swift, efficient and pragmatic advice to its clients'.
2018-19 edition Legal 500
We find that the Forbes team take a pragmatic and supportive approach and enjoy working with their team.
Kepak Convenience Foods
We approached Forbes Solicitors on a recommendation because as a small independent organisation we needed clear guidance and backing on HR matters.
Piccadilly Garden & Support Service
The Forbes team were fantastic, the work and effort they put in was impressive and I was made to feel at ease throughout the proceedings. I can not thank the Forbes team enough
Without doubt Jonathan Holden is like a security blanket. He understands that schools need to act in the best interest of school as a whole
Brenda P Allen
I will keep promoting you and your services because I'm fully committed to the quality of your work and the impact that it has in school.
Ashton Community Science College
Amy Stokes was more than helpful throughout the whole process - Thank you Amy.
Forbes are proactive in relation to changes in legislation and keep me informed via regular seminars, updates and bulletins.
Business Support Manager
Birchall Catering Supplies Ltd
I have always found everyone at Forbes to be approachable, helpful and professional, and would have no hesitation in recommending them to any other business
E A Foulds Limited
May I say how much the employment team at Forbes have helped Samlesbury Hall with staff issues over the past ten years.
...we have found Forbes to be an excellent team of people to work with, fully understanding our needs and goals.
Apeks Marine Equipment Ltd.