Prevention is better than Cure - A cause for Celebration for Patients with Cauda Equina

Clinical Negligence Article

28 November, 2018

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare and potentially life changing condition where It is a severe narrowing of the spinal canal usually caused by a prolapsed invertebral disc. It happens when the nerve in the "cauda equina" suddenly become severely compressed. This can lead to numbness and weakness in the legs, numbness in the saddle area, difficulty controlling the bladder and even loss of bladder control. Timing issues are key and it ought to be treated as an emergency, rather than with urgency.

The consequences of failing to spot it can be catastrophic and lead to irreversible nerve damage, permanent disability and psychological problems. Given the nature of the problem that this can cause it quite often leads to six figure settlements where negligence can be proved.

The Warning Signs (red flags)

In May of this year the Medical Protection Society and NICE worked together to revise the guidelines in the hope that this would help GP's and other healthcare professionals make appropriate referrals.

Practice Business reported that the Medical Protection Society and NICE had updated the cauda equina "red flags" that could have significant impact on patient's safety;

  • Bilateral sciatica
  • Severe or progressive bilateral neurological deficit of the legs, such as major motor weakness with knee extension, ankle eversion or foot dorsiflexion.
  • Difficulty in urinating or impaired sensation of urinary flow, if untreated this may lead to
  • urinary retention with overflow urinary incontinence.
  • Loss of sensation of rectal fullness, if untreated this may lead to irreversible faecal incontinence.
  • Perianal, perineal or genital sensory loss (saddle anaesthesia or paraesthesia).
  • Laxity of the anal sphincter.

The majority of negligence cases arise from delay in referral and diagnosis and these changes reflect the importance of urgent investigation.

Generally, the earlier the decompression surgery (normally a laminectomy) is performed, the better the outcome.

In the case of Barry Frederick Hewes v (1 West Hertfordshire Hospital NHS Trust) (2 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust) (3 Panjak Fanna 2018) the GP was a Defendant and sought to make an application for a decision on an issue before the trial. The application was to remove the doctor from proceedings. The Court on Appeal decided that the Application would not be considered until the experts had reported and the evidence exchanged. It was unlikely to be allowed until after the experts had met and produced joint reports to see if they could narrow the issues.

To succeed in clinical negligence you have to show that the doctor had failed to act in accordance with a responsible body of medical opinion. Until the Claimant had the chance to report properly as directed by the court, this issue could not be determined.

This demonstrates the importance of medical evidence in these cases and the willingness of the Court to allow proper reporting within the court timetable on these complex issues.

Going forward, Investigation reports prepared by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman under Section 15 (1)(a) will hopefully add weight to a number of recommendations to improve patient care.

If you are affected by any of the issues mentioned above, you can find support with Leonie Millard is working with CESA (Cauda Equina Syndrome Association) to promote awareness, and can provide advice and guidance in exploring whether a medical case has been dealt with negligently.

If you are looking for any more information with regards to our services view our Clinical Negligence section. You can also contact Leonie Millard in our Clinical Negligence department via email or phone on 01254 770517. Alternatively send any question through to Forbes Solicitors via our online Contact Form.


22 Mar 2019

Clinical Negligence


Prevention is better than cure

Read the article

Outstanding service, impressive results. Highly approachable, and given practical clear advice. I would recommend Forbes to anyone who requires legal advice

Mr Vincent Corleone

More clients

Having been recommended to Forbes Solicitors due to their experience in Clinical Negligence claims, I soon realised that I had been given good advice.

Paul Johnston

More clients

Very Grateful for the expert advice my son and I received throughout his clinical negligence case.

More clients

"Friendly, thorough, took time to explain difficult issues. Felt confident with her advice and approach. Handled very professionally and achieved a good result. Would recommend."

More clients

"Leonie was clear, approachable, accessible and thorough in her approach to my case. It involved some complicated issues and I am very satisfied with the result. It has helped me to move on"

More clients

"Thanks for making a difficult process a little easier. Leonie showed empathy, knowledge and understanding, and left no stone unturned. Thank you"

More clients

"Friendly, thorough, took time to explain difficult issues. Felt confident with her advice and approach. Handled very professionally and achieved a good result. Would recommend."

Carl Burdon

More clients

We couldn't have wished for a better team to have helped us through this extremely difficult time.

Carol & Colin Harrison

More clients

Thank you so much for the persistent and diligent effort which you made in bringing a successful conclusion to the sad case of the clinical negligence of my late husband Stan.

Margaret Fuller

More clients

I found Leonie approachable and she dealt with sensitive maters with tact and empathy and explained difficult issues well.

Susan Horsfield

More clients

Very happy & delighted with the end result, a big thank you to Leonie

Christine Sullivan

More clients

Leonie Millard is a brilliant solicitor who is always ready to help and go the extra mile

Andrew Clarkson

More clients

Make an enquiry