No Duty to Warn Opponents of Mistakes

Together we are Forbes


25 July, 2019

Sarah Wilkinson

Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd (2019)[2019] EWCA Civ 985

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a party is not required to draw attention to mistakes made by another party.

The Facts

The Claimants, through their solicitors, purported to serve a Claim Form and Particulars of Claim valued in excess of £5million on the Defendant's solicitors, before the expiry of the issue of the Claim Form. The Defendant's solicitors did not have authority to accept service and as a result, the claim form expired unserved and limitation subsequently expired.

After taking instructions, the Defendant deliberately did not inform the Claimant until after expiry of the deadline for service that they were not authorised to accept service.

At first instance before Master Bowles, the Claimant successfully applied for retrospective validation of service under the court's discretion on the basis that the Defendant's solicitor could have informed the Claimant's representative in which case they could, and would have served in time. The Master held that the solicitors had an obligation to the court to give effect to the overriding objective rather than to employ inappropriate "technical game playing".

However, HHJ Hodge QC, sitting in the High Court, allowed an appeal from the Master setting aside the Claim Form and dismissing the action.

The Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal unanimously reversed the decision and concluded that the overriding objective did not require a Defendant to alert a Claimant to the fact that its service of the Claim Form was defective before the limitation period expired.

Forbes Comment

It is worth noting that Lady Justice Asplin commented that depending on the facts, the position might be different if there is a substantial period before the expiry of the limitation period or where the other party has contributed to the mistake. The situation is far from straightforward and parties must therefore carefully consider the possible repercussions of failing to notify an opponent of a procedural error.

For more information contact Sarah Wilkinson in our Insurance department via email or phone on 01254 662831. Alternatively send any question through to Forbes Solicitors via our online Contact Form.

Learn more about our Insurance department here

Surveillance Evidence leads to finding of Fundamental Dishonesty…

Accident Prone Claimant Loses at Trial

Contact Us

Get in touch to see how our experts could help you.

Call0800 689 3206

CallRequest a call back

EmailSend us an email

Contacting Us

Monday to Friday:
09:00 to 17:00

Saturday and Sunday: